9/11 Truth Teleconference

The mission of the 9/11 Truth Teleconference is to enable activists from local 9/11 Truth and Peace & Justice groups to discuss and respond to the official account of September 11, 2001 and the policies which ensued therefrom. In the present age of corrupt media, government, and justice system, local activists from around the world, by communicating amongst themselves, seek to promote and coordinate appropriate actions in response to the ongoing cover-up of the aforementioned events of September 11, 2001. An hour-long teleconference will take place on the last Wednesday of each month to discuss tactics and strategies to support the objective of widespread awareness of the truth about 9/11. We acknowledge the need for a credible investigation.

9/11 Truth Teleconference
A coalition of 9/11 truth leaders and groups has been
communicating on a monthly basis (via teleconference)
about supporting critical campaigns to expose the U.S.
government and media cover-up on what really happened.

An email  list serve discussion group for the

9/11 Truth Teleconference is at this URL link:


Before 2011 Minutes of teleconferences

were kept at 911blogger.com

For current teleconferences- go to this URL page:



About flybynews

Flyby News (FN) came out of the campaign to stop or expose the high risk NASA Cassini (plutonium) Earth flyby. FN's first campaign at the turn of the millennium was to prevent the expansion of the arms race and US domination of the planet with space-based weapons. Yet the theft of democracy in the US 2000 election, the Supreme Court appointment of George W. Bush as US President, and the events of September 11, 2001, led to the termination of the 1972 Ballistic Missile Treaty, along with many other actions of crimes against humanity and civil freedom. The exploitation and cover-up of September 11, 2001 led to illegal, deceptive wars, which has accelerated climate change, and the downfall of financial and social justice. Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence, since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997. More info @ FlybyNews.com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to 9/11 Truth Teleconference

  1. Robin Hordon says:

    I am offering a concept to deal with censorship withing the various 9.11 Truth Organizations in gneral, and regarding 911blogger specifically. It goes as follows:

    All people and organizations within the 9.11 Truth Community, when differing opinions and conclusions of similar evidence emerge, should support the establishment of “Friendly Fences” between the various lines or approaches of research into the events on 9.11.2001 as well as between the individuals doing such research or offering input, information or opinions. This will allow and support the many avenues of research and consideration that remains ahead for the 9.11 Truth Community and will also eliminate the vast majority of infighting between the various lines of research and people conducting it, and most importantly, establishing such “Friendly Fences” will disable cointelpro operations which are currently creating much dissention within the 9.11 Truth Community itself.

    The foundation of establishing the need to build “Friendly Fences” is that the US Government and its various agencies and departments have NOT provided to the public square, either enough, trustworthy or comprehensive evidence and information about the events surrounding 9.11.2001, and further that, no firm conclusions can be made about many subjects or events at this time. Additionally, because of the witholding of this evidence, it is concluded that the US Governement and its various agencies and departments are in fact continuing to cover up their roles in the events of 9.11.2001.

    And finally, by establishing “Friendly Fences” within the 9.11 Truth Community, this would allow individuals and various research teams to offer their points of view, evidence and any conclusions without fear of defamitory and uncivil reaction from within the 9.11 Truth Community itself.

    In taking the position that the 9.11 Truth Community cannot yet make firm conclusions about what happened on 9.11.2001 primarily BECAUSE the US Government is witholding evidence, then the 9.11 Truth Community now both: aligns itself with, and gains credibility and commonality with the public in general. This relationship will exist because the majority of US citizens also do not trust that the US Governement is telling them the truth about the various US Governement’s roles in its historical nefarious activities including the events of 9.11.2001.

    Allowing more fair and open research without the fear of retribution or personal attack, disabling COINTELPRO operations, and standing on the same side of the general public regarding the lack of truths and evidence being provided by the US Government are three, very important and worthy goals that will be met by establishing a concept of building “Friendly Fences” within the 9.11 truth Community.

    Thank you for your time in considering this important step ahead in the 9.11 Truth Community.

    Robin Hordon
    Long time political activist
    Originator of CI…Civil Informationing
    9.11 Truth for World Peace and Justice activist
    Puget Sound Peace Presence originator
    Pilot and former PATCO air traffic controller and government whistleblower
    Arrestee at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant

  2. Brian Good says:

    Your proposal seems like just a Big Tent With Partitions.

    It’s supposed to be a 9/11 Truth Movement, not a 9/11 Wacky Theories That Can Not Easily be Proven Wrong movement. If, as you say, we can not make firm conclusions, then it behooves us to avoid tolerating squishy and goofy-sounding ones.

  3. flybynews says:

    Robin, We need more peace-makers such as yourself. What we most all agree upon regarding the cover-up, and fabrication of the outlandish official ‘conspiracy theory’ is what unites us.. To not allow us to get divided into smaller areas of disagreement by those researching different aspects of the false flag operation is simply intelligent thinking. Thank you!

  4. Brian Good says:

    flybynews, to suggest that the disagreements in the truth movement are merely a question of ignorance is disingenuous. Those of us who reject the nonsense peddled by the Citizen Investigation Team and Willie Rodriguez do so because we have investigated their claims and we find them to be based upon silly assumptions, sloppy research, and outright lies.

  5. Robin Hordon says:

    Those who think that they are “cock sure” about exactly what happened at the Pentagon and with AA77, and are also “cock sure” that what others think went on at the Pentagon and with AA77 is WRONG…and when considering the paucity of valid information and evidence…and when considering the abundance of dis-information fed into the ongoing analysis of the Pentagon-AA77 events by the US Government, are doing the greatest disservice to the 9.11 Truth Movement all the while holding high in the air the flags and banners of: “We are doing it for the good of the 9.11 Truth Movement…because we are so much more wise, intelligent, analytical and insightful than anybody else in the 9.11 truth Movemnet…JUST TRUST US…because we really mean well…and we really are more competent than all the rest of you non-believers of minimal available information…beacuse the OCT is really right on with AA77 and the Pentagon…honest, we really mean it!”

    The 9.11 Truth for World Peace and Justice Movement does not need any difinitive positions about what happened to AA77 and at the Penatgon as the 10th anniversary approaches beacuse so much evidence is being witheld.

    The ONLY element of the 9.11 truth Movement which needs to have such definitive statements made as the anniversary approaches are those associated with counterintelligence and thusly, by design and plan, are trying to corner the 9.11 truth for World Peace and Justice Movement into taking positions that have equal chances of being as fraudlulent as any other aspect presented by many people and organizations that are ALSO makingthe SAME TYPES of presumptive, bold and “red herring” comments and positions.

    You tell me what the variances in the readout of the radio altimeter readings contained within the FDR that “allegedly” belonged to the “alleged” AA77 meant between 2 and 4 minutes before the “alleged” impact times of the “alleged” AA77 and then I will know that you have at least done a minimal amount of research into what happened with AA77 and the Pentagon. barring that, please take your seat. Thank you.

    Next presumptive fool to take stage please…

    Robin Hordon
    Kingston, WA

    Federal Whistleblower with inside information…
    Commercial pilot with 1600 hours…
    Former Air Traffic Controller certified to analyze radar and audio data…
    Puget Sound Peace Presence…originator
    CI…Civil Informationing: modernizing public activism…author
    Arrestee at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant…

  6. Brian Good says:

    Mr. Hordon, I agree entirely with you that there is “a paucity of valid information and evidence” and an “abundance of dis-information” with respect to the Pentagon events. I disagree with your apparent belief that this state of affairs justifies tolerance for rampant speculation and outright lies on the part of Pentagon theorists. Since we don’t know and we can’t know, we should simply avoid comment and so avoid making fools of ourselves.

    You with your ATC background could far more effectively employ your energies and expertise in addressing the issues of communications failure between FAA and NORAD, and NORAD’s inability to intercept the 9/11 aircraft than in speculating about altimeter data you presumably believe to be faked anyway.

  7. Robin Hordon says:

    I admire your consistency, IE: knowing whats best for the 9.11 Truth for World Peace and Justice Community regarding early conclusions, and of course, what would both be the best way for me to spend my time and for what I should conclude at his point. Thank you for these insights as I have been very confused as to how to both conduct myself and of course, how to assemble my positions that agree with you. Been floundering around for years and now I see “the path”.

    One of the best results of building “Friendly Fences” is that it offers an opportunity for those are forwarding cointelpro approaches, inputs, tactics and conclusions to become exposed because there is no need OTHER THAN to have Friendly Fences within the 9.11 Truth Movement. By FAR the favorite cointelpro tactic is the one which has “Truthers” take the position that “their” conduct of eliminating other’s evidence and theories about anything is of greatest import because “Its for the good of the 9.11 Truth Movement.” Now isn’t that haughty self-assigned position the most important thing ever in this almost ten year citizen’s investigation into crimes by the state? Again, thankfully there are a few clairvoyant Truthers such as yourself out there to keep us all on “the right track.” [This is not an indorsement of CIT’s full work…they just grabbed those words to describe what they are doing.]

    And your “wisdom” regarding what the radio altimeter was showing between four and two minutes before “alleged” impact? You seem to have forgotten to answer my question.

    Let whatever evidence that is available right now tell an interim set of stories that can be assembled by those who hold specific theories and who see things differently based upon this minimum of evidence. Things will add up and will sort themselves out someday.

    Research will be ongoing for decades beyond 9.11.2011 and I agree with David Ray Griffin when it comes down to AA77 and the Pentagon, we should start all over from the beginning in our analysis of what happened to AA77 and The Pentagon.

    OH, here is another question for a person such as yourself who is as insightful, knowledgeable, , well researched, difinitive “and cock sure” about what EXACTLY happened at the Pentagon as you seem to be.

    What is the floor of the radar coverage of the PLA radar site at a point where the high speed eastbound primary target [ “alleged” to be that of AA77 ] suddenly “popped up” over central West Virginia, and what does this radar floor have to do with the airvehicle [AA77?] that may have made the descending right hand turn and proceeded into, over, or both at the Pentagon?

    Oh, and another question that you probably also have in your files somewhere: What is the original source of the 7000 foot altitude from which the airvehicle in question started its descending 330 degree right turn and then on and into, or over the Pentagon…or both? And the follow-up, what would this original source expose regarding who was watching the unidentified primary target?

    I would be interested in adding your answers and perceptions into my own analysis as I’m sure that they are well thought out and thoroughly researched.

    Thanks again for helping me with my own research and analysis and how best to use my time.

  8. Brian Good says:

    Mr. Hordon, I don’t have an opinion about the altimeter data because it is not reliable because it comes from the government (you claim the FDR was planted) and because it was extracted and interpreted by some unidentified person whose competence I have no reason to trust. “Research” on the subject is as meaningless as debating the titles of the videos alleged to be in Osama’s collection. It’s a waste of time.

    If CIT were serious about finding truth they would seek out Deb Anlauf, they would seek out east-of-Pentagon flyover witnesses, they would seek out Dihle’s alleged flyaway witnesses, they would interview the people who cleaned up the mess at the Pentagon, and they would try to come up with a plausible mechanism for planting the cloverleaf light poles. Their lack of interest in doing so is damning.

    It takes more than good fences to make good neighbors. If my neighbor behind his fence is having all-night doper parties, accumulating garbage, growing weeds, harboring rats, and storing flammables carelessly, he is degrading the quality and the safety of the neighborhood and his business becomes the business of his neighbors. Friendly tolerance in that case serves no one except the offender.

  9. Robin Hordon says:

    You have not described a Friendly Fence at all…indeed, what you have described is an UNfriendly Fence because so much “stuff” is being thrown over it’s boundaries and on into the neighbor’s yards…without approval!

    A Friendly Fence would have all the activity noted by you above to take place without bothering the neighbors in any way…

    And then IF the neighbors want to take a look at what’s going on in that noisy fenced in area, then they would do so at their own risk…

    And then they would be able to…adopt all or some…or reject all or some…of the activities going on in that yard.

    That’s my entire point…and you and your groups along with CIT’s same short sighted hardheadedness who can be described as: “AA77-Pentagon-know it all-hardliners”…simply cannot, or do not want to understand this. I think its because you and CIT have self-appointed yourselves to: “safeguard the integrity of the 9.11TM”…which is pompasity at its highest.

    Also, you owe me three answers about AA77 and The Pentagon since you and your clan are so well “concluded” about what went on there.

    9.11 Truth for World Peace and Justice
    Puget Sound Peace Presence
    CI…Civil Informationing: modernizing public activism…author
    Commercial Pilot, former Air Traffic Controller at ZBW…Boston ARTCC
    arrestee at Seabrook Nuclear Powerplant

  10. flybynews says:

    I am pasting in this comment posted under March minutes by Craig McKee, who’s comments are most reasonable, so I wanted them here, too..
    I hope Brian listens, and is sincere.. friendly fences and good neighbors are much better than throwing rocks from glass houses.

    Author : Craig McKee – URL : http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com
    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
    Comment: (This is the same response I gave to this comment from Mr. Good on my own site, http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=578&action=edit):

    I have no problem with the suggestion that more research could be done and that more witnesses could be found and interviewed. And you certainly have the right to cite witnesses that you feel contradict CIT’s research. But there are serious problems with some of your other suggestions.

    The first and most obvious is your suggestion that CIT prohibit its supporters from expressing certain opinions. Are you seriously suggesting that CIT has control over those who support their research?
    When people use terms like “stupid” in connection with the Pentagon event, they seem to usually be doing so to attack CIT. I don’t think stupid is a very strong word to use in debating an issue.

    Whether or not there is any evidence of a 757 is really not the point. I contend, as do many others who support CIT’s work, that the airplane parts found at the site were not from Flight 77 or any other 757 that crashed into the building that day.
    As for the hole, it clear wasn’t large enough for a 757 to disappear into the building. And no, I don’t buy the Mike Walter fantasy of folding wings.

    The last point I’ll address is the ‘demonizing of co-operating witnesses’ reference, because this is clearly one of your favourite arguments. It’s also very popular with the anti-CIT crowd at 911Blogger, which is losing credibility with an ever-growing number of 9/11 Truthers.

    Lloyde England is not a demon and he’s not an evil mastermind behind a conspiracy, but he has given an account of what happened to him on that morning that defies common sense. I’m sorry if you feel this is unfair to him, or that it demonizes him, but I simply don’t believe his account. Aren’t you disbelieving all the witnesses who support the north-of-Citgo flight path? Their accounts clearly don’t jive with the light poles being hit. Why is this different?

    You, and others who agree with you, seem to want to support the official story of the Pentagon on 9/11, and I still don’t understand why.

  11. flybynews says:

    I understand why some people repel against speculation, but if it is stated as speculation – and with some evidence to show why one is interested in such speculation,. I think such communication would not be misleading. It is only when one person or another believe they know what happened and what could not happen, and they want to impose their ideas on others (for the best of intentions), but this can stymie communications and our understanding that take us away from our consensus that there was a government cover-up, that buildings don’t behave that way from office fires alone, and the cover-up with the mainstream media is part of an inside orchestration operating criminally with no accountability within the US government – and such actions have consequences for domestic and foreign fascist policies where truth, justice, and freedom are lost.

    When we fight one another over specifics, agreeing to disagree can work, especially if we find common ground on the more significant issues where we are in agreement.

  12. Pingback: 9/11 Truth Teleconference Group convenes « The Canadian Headlines Newspaper | lecanadian

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s